Chess 2023Apr – Good / Bad guys win AND Bad / Good guys lose if and only if Real / Fake WC

Series : Good guys vs Bad guys – Table of Contents

---

World championships ( 2016 – 2023 and well even starting 2013 ) :

Bad guys win if and only if it’s a fake world championship.

For some reason in finals of classical WCCs / classical WFRCCs / rapid WFRCCs from 2016 to 2023

• the good guys
  • are less strong at rapid,
  • are Jewish or American and
    • This is of course under the idea that top Russian (and I guess former Soviet) are Jewish – in particularly for Sergey Karjakin. Of course I don’t necessarily think this, but it helps me further defame / detract Magnus to be anti-Semitic / anti-American. Lol.
  • (except in 2019) lose.
• the bad guys
  • are better at rapid,
  • are either gentile & non-American or a traitor to Jews / Americans
  • (except in 2019) win.

---

Side Note 1 :

Rapid tiebreaks are anti-semitic? Lol.

---

Side Note 2 :

Oh actually, the last time a Jewish or American player won a classical WCC was 2006 – Vlad Kramnik won on rapid tiebreaks but had forfeited a game in protest. Of course Wesley So is the only Jewish or American player to win a classical WC (WCC or WFRCC) since Vlad ! Yet another item in the list of Parallels between Wesley So and Bobby Fischer

• Bobby Fischer ended 24 years of Soviet domination.
• Wesley So ended 12 years of gentile non-American domination (of Vishy & Magnus).

---

Anyway, w/o further ado, here’s the table.

Main stuff – not just for rapid tiebreaks

WC	Fake/Real	Why?	Good guy	Bad guy	Who won?
2016 WCC	Fake	Rapid ( Note1 ), Black ( Note5 )	Sergey Karjakin	Magnus Carlsen	Bad guy
2018 WCC	Fake	Rapid ( Note1 ), Magnus never beat Fabi in classical WCC. ( You could say it’s real because Magnus beat Fabi in 2019 classical WFRCC but ummm … Fabi could’ve lost classical strength for the year. )	Fabiano Caruana ( But actually even if this is real … Fabi isn’t quite on my good guys list. E said Hans is an alien if not a cheater iirc though could’ve been joking. Fabi did say e doesn’t think Hans cheated at Sinquefield Cup. And anyway I don’t have a corresponding bad guy, so eh. Lol.)	Magnus Carlsen	Bad guy
2019 classical WFRCC	REAL	Note3	Wesley So	Magnus Carlsen	GOOD GUY/S (Note4)
2021 WCC	Fake	Rapid (Note1) & Magnus cheated.	Ian Nepomniachtchi	Magnus Carlsen	Bad guy
2022 rapid WFRCC	Fake	Pretended to be classical. (Note2)	Ian Nepomniachtchi, Wesley So	Hikaru Nakamura & thus h overlord Magnus Carlsen	Bad guy
2023 WCC	Fake	Rapid (Note1), Black (Note5)	Ian Nepomniachtchi	Liren Ding & thus h overlord Magnus Carlsen	Bad guy

( Note1 ) Since tiebreaks are rapid games instead of classical armageddon w/ auction, the lower rated rapid player of course has to take risks player but also has an opportunity cost dilemma of how much to prepare in rapid. What Magnus actually proposed for the 2023 WCC was, as I understand, similar to the 2019 WFRCC ( see Note3 ) where it was a combination of classical & rapid ( & blitz if need be ), so players KNOW from the start that there’s rapid ( & blitz if need be ).

• Of course, the ideal thing assuming chess only is pure classical and break ties by classical armageddon w/ auction, but at least there’s no opportunity cost dilemma for the lower rated rapid ( or blitz ) player.
• And of course not assuming chess only, the ideal thing is get rid of chess altogether. Lol.
• HOWEVER, if weaker rapid wins in classical or wins rapid tiebreaks, then a fortiori it’s real because the steep odds that the weaker rapid overcame.

( Note2 ) If this becomes a real WC, which would happen only by FIDE’s would-be acknowledgement that this is not ‘slow rapid’ in the sense that both 32.5min & 60min are ‘slow rapid’ but rather that 45+15=60min is classical, then it becomes a real rapid WFRCC and then the list is revised to classical WFRCC / WCC only. Lol.

( Note3 )

3.1 – No one caught up in score by winning in a lower time control if they have lost 1 of the higher time controls.

3.2 – Lower time controls, if need be, are played regardless of higher time control score.

3.3 – Theoretically, in either the 2019 WFRCC quarter-finals or the semi-finals & finals, a player can lose every game in the classical portion but then tie by winning every game in the rapid & blitz portions. In general, I might consider any such WC fake if someone caught up in lower time controls after losing in a higher time control. Not really sure actually.

( Note4 )

Ian Nepomniachtchi, having a higher score in both classical & rapid, was unclear 3rd place.

( Note5 )

• Chess 2023Apr – Real / Fake WC – There ARE odds based on black wins (re Sergey 2016 & Nepo 2023)

Other stuff since 2013 – just rapid tiebreaks

WC	Fake / Real	Why?	Good guy	Bad guy	Who won?
2013 WCC	Fake	Rapid(Note1)	Vishy Anand	Magnus Carlsen	Bad guy
2014 WCC	Fake	Rapid(Note1)	Vishy Anand	Magnus Carlsen	Bad guy
2023 women’s WCC	Fake	Rapid(Note1)	Tingjie Lei	Wenjun Ju	Bad guy
2018May women’s WCC	Fake	Rapid(Note1)	Zhongyi Tan (good?)	Wenjun Ju	Bad guy
2018May women’s WCC	Fake	Rapid(Note1), Note6	Kateryna Lagno (good?)	Wenjun Ju	Bad guy
2020 women’s WCC	Fake	Rapid(Note1), Note6	Aleksandra Goryachkina (good?)	Wenjun Ju	Bad guy

• I could include like every women’s WCC for 2013, 2015, 2016 & 2017, but idk if the winners (Hou Yifan, Mariya Muzychuk, Zhongyi Tan) are good or bad.

Note6 – Wenjun actually had more black wins both times though. Eh good for Wenjun.

---

Shortlink: https://wp.me/p1w4Rr-s5

Post ID: p1w4Rr-s5